Please disable your adblock and script blockers to view this page

Barrett sidesteps Democratic questions amid high-stakes grilling | TheHill


Senate
Supreme Court
ObamaCare
The Senate Judiciary Committee
Barrett’s
the Supreme Court
the White House
KaganSupreme Court
GOP
Montana Supreme Court
Oracle
Google Supreme Court
ACA
Congress
Barr Trump
situations."It
the Senate Judiciary Committee
Trump Democrats
NW Suite 900 Washington DC
Capitol Hill Publishing Corp.
News Communications


Amy Coney Barrett
Kagan
Elena KaganElena
Obama
Dianne FeinsteinDianne
Ruth Bader GinsburgRuth Bader GinsburgMcConnell
Senate.“Now
Richard Blumenthal
John TrumpTwo
McGrath
Chuck GrassleyCharles
Ernest GrassleyDemocrats
George Floyd
Dick DurbinRichard
Joseph DurbinDemocrats
SponsoredThe


Democrats
LGBTQ
Protesters
revealing."So
COVID-19
Republicans
Black

No matching tags


1625 K Street


Calif.
D-Conn
Iowa).Democrats
Inc.

No matching tags

Positivity     41.00%   
   Negativity   59.00%
The New York Times
SOURCE: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/520793-barrett-sidesteps-democratic-questions-amid-high-stakes-grilling
Write a review: The Hill
Summary

I think she has revealed that she is evading a lot of the tough questions," Blumenthal said.Democrats are eager to have Barrett weigh in on health care, including the Affordable Care Act (ACA), as they put the issue at the forefront of the fight over her nomination."Now they think they have a winner to tilt the court not only on the Affordable Care Act but on reproductive freedoms and the sensible gun violence measures that states are passing,” Blumenthal told reporters on Tuesday morning.Barrett said she was not “hostile” to the ACA, or any legislation passed by Congress.Senators asked Barrett if she would recuse herself from the ACA case or a case involving the outcome of the Nov. 3 election, saying that President TrumpDonald John TrumpTwo ethics groups call on House to begin impeachment inquiry against Barr Trump relishes return to large rallies following COVID-19 diagnosis McGrath: McConnell 'can't get it done' on COVID-19 relief MORE’s comments on how he would expect his nominee to rule in both cases presented conflicts for her.Barrett declined to say what she would do in those situations."It always happens after consultation with the full court, so I can't offer an opinion on recusal without short-circuiting that entire process," Barrett said.Asked separately if the president had the authority to unilaterally delay the election, Barrett declined to say, adding that giving “off the cuff answers” would make her a “legal pundit.”Barrett, however, did try to put space between herself and the White House about any cases that may reach the Supreme Court, noting she had never discussed the ACA or an election-related case with Trump or anyone else on his staff.“I have had no conversation with the president or any of his staff on how I might rule in that case.

As said here by Jordain Carney