Did we underestimate Russia's Sputnik V vaccine? - The ...
Companies, agencies, institutions, etc
Trump
CNN
Lancet
Pfizer-BioNTech
Moderna
Russian Direct Investment Fund
Bloomberg News
the Global Health Policy Center
E.U.
Kremlin
Washington Post
EuropeThe
PolicyThe
People
Sputnik
Sputnik V —
Kirill Dmitriev
Sputnik V’s
Stephen Morrison
Robyn Dixon
Vladimir Putin
Sputnik V.
Hugo López-Gatell
Viktor Orban
enough.”It
Angela Merkel
Josep Borrell
Alexei Navalny
Michael Birnbaum
Biden
Garry Kasparov
Groups
Russian
Russians
Soviets
Americans
British
Iranians
Mexican
German
Physical locations
Europe
North America
the Middle East
Latin America
Yemen?Biden
Places
Kremlin
the Center for Strategic and International Studies
Locations
U.S.
Russia
Washington
Iran
India
Turkey
Brazil
South Korea
Argentina
Mexico
E.U.
the United States
Britain
Hungary
Brussels
Moscow
Navalny
Myanmar
Events
No matching tags
Summary
Sputnik V is considerably cheaper than its Western competitors and does not require the same sort of ultracold storage infrastructure that would complicate distribution of the Pfizer vaccine in much of the developing world.“This is a watershed moment for us,” Kirill Dmitriev, chief executive of the state-run Russian Direct Investment Fund, which is behind both Sputnik V’s development and its international rollout, told Bloomberg News.And it could amount to a rare soft-power victory for the Kremlin. “The Russian Sputnik V vaccine is safe, it has 92 percent efficacy against COVID, it can be used safely and is effective in seniors,” Hugo López-Gatell, the Mexican government’s chief pandemic spokesperson, told reporters last week.
As said here by https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/02/10/russia-sputnik-vaccine-underestimated/