MenuPlease
House
Google
Facebook
Amazon
Apple
Standard Oil
the Progressive Policy Institute
Axios
Congress
AxiosGoogle
Workspace
G Suite
Microsoft Office
Ed Jones/AFP
Getty ImagesHundreds
Chevron
FedEx
the Chamber of Commerce
the American Legislative Exchange Council
the Brennan Center
SXSW Online
Getty ImagesMelinda French Gates
White House
Hill
Sarah Grillo
Alec Stapp
Jane Chung
Melinda French Gates
Ron Klain
Susan Rice
French
No matching tags
the White House
U.S.
US
Washington
No matching tags
Get smarter, faster about your hometown.MenuPlease enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Please enter a valid email.Illustration: Sarah Grillo/AxiosThe sweeping antitrust bills House lawmakers introduced Friday don't just propose broad new principles of digital-age competition — they put giant bullseyes on the backs of Google, Facebook, Amazon and Apple.Why it matters: Laws crafted now to tie the hands of today's dominant companies will still be on the books for years and decades to come, and critics are already flagging possible unintended consequences.
As said here by Ashley Gold, Margaret Harding McGill, Scott Rosenberg