Please disable your adblock and script blockers to view this page

Lithium is now the fastest web framework


JSON
ORM
HTML
UTF-8
the TechEmpower Performance Rating
TPR
GitHub
Framework Benchmarks
Facebook
Microsoft
HTTP
ServerCentral
Microsoft Azure
Round 12
ASP.NET
Linux
TFB


Frameworks

Dockerized

No matching tags


Peak


the Framework Benchmarks Google Group
Round 19
Travis CI


Peak Hosting
Dell R720xd
Wrk


Round 19 —
Round 17
Frameworks Round 2

Positivity     35.00%   
   Negativity   65.00%
The New York Times
SOURCE: https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=test&runid=57b25c85-082a-4013-b572-b0939006eaff&hw=ph&test=composite&a=2
Write a review: Hacker News
Summary

HTTP pipelining is enabled and higher client-side concurrency levels are used for this test (see the "Data table" view).Example response:For a more detailed description of the requirements, see the Source Code and Requirements section.Frameworks flagged with a icon are part of the TechEmpower Performance Rating (TPR) measurement for hardware environments. The test implementations are largely community-contributed and all source is available at the GitHub repository.Note: We use the word "framework" loosely to refer to platforms, micro-frameworks, and full-stack frameworks.In a March 2013 blog entry, we published the results of comparing the performance of several web application frameworks executing simple but representative tasks: serializing JSON objects and querying databases. We would like our tests for every framework to perform optimally, so we invite you to please join in.Feedback has been continuous and we plan to keep updating the project in several ways, such as:Round 19 — Representing the result of processing over 4,600 pull requests at GitHub, Round 19 also introduces composite scores (scores reflecting the results from all test types) and hardware environment performance ratings.Round 18 — This round included several requirements clarifications such as specificying how often implementations are required to recompute the response Date header and stricter validation.Round 17 — Another Continuous Benchmarking run promoted to an official round, Round 17 now includes 179 frameworks. We are optimistic that over time, more test implementations will be able to leverage this capability.Round 16 — Now Dockerized and running on a new 10-gigabit powered hardware environment, Round 16 of the Framework Benchmarks project brings new performance highs and increased stability.Round 15 — The project exceeded 3,000 stars on GitHub and has processed nearly 2,500 pull requests. Note that this round was conducted only on physical hardware within the ServerCentral environment; tests on the cloud environment will return for Round 15.Round 13 — Microsoft's ASP.NET team delivers the most impressive improvement we've seen in this project—a 85,000% increase in plaintext results for ASP.NET Core—making it a top-performing framework at the fundamentals of HTTP request routing. Round 13 also sees new hardware and cloud environments from ServerCentral and Microsoft Azure.Round 12 — Marking the last round on the Peak environment, Round 12 sees some especially high Plaintext scores.Round 11 — 26 more frameworks, three more languages, and the volume cranked to 11.Round 10 — Significant restructuring of the project's infrastructure, including re-organization of the project's directory structure and integration with Travis CI for rapid review of pull requests, and the addition of numerous frameworks.Round 9 — Thanks to the contribution of a 10-gigabit testing environment by Peak Hosting, the network barrier that frustrated top-performing frameworks in previous rounds has been removed. Even more frameworks have been contributed by the community and the testing methodology was changed slightly thanks to enhancements to the testing tool named Wrk.Round 2 — In April, we published a follow-up blog entry named "Frameworks Round 2" where we incorporated changes suggested and contributed by the community.Round 1 — In a March 2013 blog entry, we published the results of comparing the performance of several web application frameworks executing simple but representative tasks: serializing JSON objects and querying databases.

As said here by