Please disable your adblock and script blockers to view this page

Microsoft's Surface Pro X Is an Expensive Mess. Don't Buy One


2-in-1
Microsoft
Intel
AMD
Qualcomm
SSD
USB
Microsoft Office
the Microsoft Store
Chrome
Photoshop
Adobe
Creative Cloud
AutoCAD
LTE
SIM
CNMN Collection
Nast
Condé Nast


Monster Hunter
Microsoft Bob

No matching tags


the Surface Pro 7
the Surface Pro 7’s


Chromebook
Microsoft Edge
the Surface Pro X
the Surface Pro X’s
the Surface Laptop 3
Microsoft Surface Buying Guide
California Privacy Rights


YouTube


Surface
the Pro 7

Positivity     49.00%   
   Negativity   51.00%
The New York Times
SOURCE: https://www.wired.com/review/microsoft-surface-pro-x/
Write a review: Wired
Summary

Nonetheless, Microsoft’s stated goal with this machine was “to take a mobile architecture and push the technology to make it a fully functioning powerful PC.” Whether the Surface Pro X is actually “fully functioning” is open for debate.The new SQ1 chip runs at 3 GHz, and the review system Microsoft sent to me came with 16 GB of RAM and a 256-GB SSD. Namely, it can’t run any 64-bit Windows programs designed for Intel chips (which, today, is almost everything), and it can only run older 32-bit programs via a behind-the-scenes emulator.After several days of working with the Surface Pro X, I remained confused as to why the product exists.I tried downloading a number of the most popular apps from the Microsoft Store and found that several wouldn’t install—nor would the vast majority of the standard benchmarks I run. I did manage to get one gaming benchmark to run on the Surface Pro X: Monster Hunter. One hands-down plus: LTE is included with every version of the Pro X; just add a SIM card and a data plan and you’re ready to go mobile.Microsoft does make some Surface machines we really like. I didn’t encounter any additional trouble after that, but it will take long-term testing for people to discover whether these kinds of problems will be ongoing.After several days of working with the Surface Pro X, I remained confused as to why the product exists.

As said here by Christopher Null