Please disable your adblock and script blockers to view this page

New York AG lawyer: Evidence could support action vs. Trump


AP
Trump
Amer
Trump’s
again.”Amer
Congress


Donald Trump’s
Andrew Amer
Letitia James
Martin Shkreli
Alvin Bragg
Mark Pomerantz
Brenda Sannes
Alina Habba
Ivanka
Trumps
Michael Cohen
Arthur Engoron
Michael Sisak


Republican
Democrat
point.”James’


upstate New York

No matching tags


NEW YORK
New York
Manhattan
U.S.
Habba

No matching tags

Positivity     33.00%   
   Negativity   67.00%
The New York Times
SOURCE: https://apnews.com/315738c063a586c12cc8ccfe3e1efdd6
Write a review: Associated Press
Summary

NEW YORK (AP) — As a federal judge weighs Donald Trump’s lawsuit seeking to halt a civil investigation into his business practices, a lawyer for the New York attorney general’s office said Friday that evidence found throughout the three-year probe could support legal action against the former president, his company, or both.The lawyer, Andrew Amer, said at a hearing in Trump’s lawsuit against Attorney General Letitia James that “there’s clearly been a substantial amount of evidence amassed that could support the filing of an enforcement proceeding,” although a final determination on filing such an action has not been made.Amer, a special litigation counsel in James’ office, said the office is “nearing the end” of the civil investigation, which James has said uncovered evidence Trump’s company misstated the value of assets like skyscrapers and golf courses on financial statements for more than a decade.James could decide to bring a lawsuit and seek financial penalties against Trump or his company, or even a ban on them being involved in certain types of businesses, as happened in January when a judge barred ex-drug company CEO Martin Shkreli from the pharmaceutical industry for life.Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has said that a parallel criminal investigation into Trump is continuing, although the term of a grand jury hearing evidence in that matter expired last month.Mark Pomerantz, who was leading the criminal probe, said in a February resignation letter that he believed there was “evidence sufficient to establish Mr. Trump’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt” for falsifying financial statements.Trump has denied wrongdoing.

As said here by MICHAEL R. SISAK