Please disable your adblock and script blockers to view this page

The controversy of 'female hysteria'


1770–1773
Sauvages
The Technology of Orgasm
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
DSM
the American Psychiatric Association
APA


Plato
condition?These
Joseph Raulin
François Boissier de Sauvages de Lacroix
Franz Anton Mesmer
Silas Weir Mitchell
Charlotte Perkins Gilman
Pierre Janet
Sigmund Freud
Rachel Maines
Richard Maurice Bucke
Spotlight


Hippocrates
French
German
American
Canadian


Europe

No matching tags


Ancient Greece
France

No matching tags

Positivity     38.00%   
   Negativity   62.00%
The New York Times
SOURCE: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/the-controversy-of-female-hysteria
Write a review: Medical News Today
Summary

According to her, the vibrator eventually emerged as a device that would save physicians some effort when treating their patients.However, more recently, scholars argue that Maines’s perspective was inaccurate and that there was no evidence to support her theory.The study paper that contradicts Maines’s theory states, “none of her English-language sources even mentions production of ‘paroxysms’ [a euphemism for orgasm] by massage or anything else that could remotely suggest an orgasm.”Yet such stories and hypotheses emerged precisely because 19th-century medical treatises did emphasize the connection between female sexuality and hysteria.Some 19th-century doctors infamously argued that problems within the genitalia could cause psychological problems in women — including hysteria.For instance, Richard Maurice Bucke, a Canadian psychiatrist active in the late 19th century, opted to perform invasive surgery, such as hysterectomies — where doctors remove the uterus — to “cure” female patients of mental illnesses.Therefore, for a long time, hysteria remained an umbrella term that included numerous and widely different symptoms, reinforcing harmful stereotypes about sex and gender.While this “condition” is no longer recognized and started to “fall out of fashion” in the 20th century, this was actually a long and unsteady process.The first Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-I) of the American Psychiatric Association (APA) — published in 1952 — did not list hysteria as a mental health condition.Yet it reappeared in the DSM-II in 1968, before the APA dropped it again in the DSM-III, in 1980.Time and again, researchers of medical history point to evidence that hysteria was little more than a way to describe and pathologize “everything that men found mysterious or unmanageable in women.”And while medical practices have evolved incomparably over the past couple of centuries, investigations still reveal that data about females are often scarce in medical studies.In turn, this continues to impact whether they receive correct diagnoses and treatments, suggesting that society and medical research have a long way to go to ensure all demographics get the best chance at appropriate healthcare.Mass hysteria is a highly controversial phenomenon that has been documented since the Middle Ages.

As said here by 0