Please disable your adblock and script blockers to view this page

The strategy behind the Lincoln Project, the anti-Trump PAC


Trump’s
State
the Lincoln Project
Lincoln Project’s
the Republican Party
the New York Times
Advertising Analytics
Priorities USA
Twitter
Fox News
the-New York Times
the Lincoln Project’s
Pod Save America
Medium Buying —
2016.The Lincoln Project
the White House
the Washington Post
Nuzzi
Trump for
a Republican Party
all.“If
Georgetown University’s Institute of Politics and Public Service


Donald Trump
Dan Barkhuff
Putin
this:“He
Rex Tillerson
Joe Biden
Barack Obama
Darth Vader
Luke Skywalker
Rick Wilson
George H.W. Bush
Steve Schmidt
John McCain
John Weaver
George Conway
Paula Jones
Bill Clinton
Kellyanne Conway
Hillary Clinton’s
Breitbart
Dan Pfeiffer
think.”Pfeiffer
votes:‼️ Jeffrey
Brad Parscale
Olivia Nuzzi
We’ll
Susan Collins
Steve Daines
J.L. Cauvin
Mo Elleithee


Republicans
Democrats
Democratic


West Point
Long Island


West Point


U.S
create?It
the United States
Twitter —
Washington, DC
New York City
Bedminster
New Jersey
Manhattan
Tulsa
Oklahoma
America
Maine
Montana
Ohio

No matching tags

Positivity     45.00%   
   Negativity   55.00%
The New York Times
SOURCE: https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/8/20/21376571/lincoln-project-trump-twitter-tv-ads-strategy
Write a review: Recode
Summary

For context: Democratic PAC American Bridge has spent $30 million on media so far; Priorities USA, another Democratic PAC, is spending $2 million per week in battleground states.We also know their ads — often made using news footage and turned around at internet speed — are consistently popular on Twitter, where they often rack up millions of views along with commentary from frustrated Democrats who want to know why their own party can’t do the same thing.Which gets at a significant part of the Lincoln Project’s appeal, at least among the extremely online set. You can fill in the ellipsis … if Biden wins, and the Lincoln Project gets credit for some of that, then maybe the future of political messaging and elections looks a lot like what we saw Trump harness in four years ago — except now, everyone’s doing it.You can see it most strikingly in the group’s ad mocking Trump’s halting walk after an appearance at West Point, a direct and intentional echo of Trump’s attacks on Hillary Clinton’s supposed frailty four years ago.Is the President of the United States physically well? “I think they are not as helpful as a lot of people think.”Pfeiffer’s argument, echoed by other Democrats who are working on this year’s race, is that the Lincoln Project’s most barbed ads, which tend to generate the most attention and virality, are the ones least likely to convert an undecided voter or a wavering Trump voter to move over to Biden — if they see them at all. “But they have to introduce new information to people, and they have to reach people where they are.”Democratic operatives I’ve talked to who think the Lincoln Project is overhyped often point to Republican Voters Against Trump, another PAC with — just like the name says — the same mission statement as the Lincoln Project. “This is not an accident that they’re not talking to voters,” says another Democratic campaigner.Other Democrats simply worry that money the Lincoln Project rounds up to defeat Trump will eventually be used for something else — maybe even for actual Republicans at some point. They argue that well-meaning donors who think they’re helping an anti-Trump group don’t realize they’re helping the people who helped create Trump, by creating a political climate that made his election possible.We’ll have a better idea of what the Lincoln Project really wants to do in the next few months. They’ve also said they intend to ramp up their ad buys in the coming months and spend “tens of millions of dollars” on ads aimed at both Trump and other Republicans in swing states; this week the group announced a $1 million buy targeted in Ohio and three other swing states.And if that’s going to happen, they’ll need to raise more money, which means that some of those viral videos may serve a purpose, after all.“If they can raise enough money against the buzz they create, they can raise enough money to run a very targeted campaign,” says Mo Elleithee, a longtime Democratic strategist who runs Georgetown University’s Institute of Politics and Public Service.

As said here by Peter Kafka