Please disable your adblock and script blockers to view this page

Trump Jr. to testify on Russia contacts before GOP-led Senate intelligence panel


FOX News Network
LLC
Fox &
the Senate Intelligence Committee
Fox News
Congress
the Senate Judiciary Committee
GOP
Trump Jr.
HOUSE
DOJ BLASTS &
FUMEFox News
Trump Jr.'s
AP Photo
The Associated Press
HOUR HOUSE
House
the Judiciary Committee
Mueller's
probe."It's
the White House
R-N.C.


Donald Trump Jr.
Mueller
Richard Burr
BARR
Robert Mueller's
Mark Warner
Susan Walsh
Michael Cohen
president's
Thom Tillis
John Cornyn
Ted Cruz
Mitch McConnell
Fox News&apos
Jason Donner
John Roberts


Democrats
Republican
Russian
Republicans
Americans


Capitol Hill


Trump Tower


Russia
committee's
North Carolina
D-Va
Washington
Moscow
Texas
Ky

No matching tags

Positivity     40.00%   
   Negativity   60.00%
The New York Times
SOURCE: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-jr-to-testify-on-russia-contacts-before-gop-led-senate-intelligence-panel
Write a review: Google News
Summary

Donald Trump Jr. joins 'Fox & Friends' to react to the president standing up to Democrats on the Mueller probe and his decision to testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee.Donald Trump Jr. will testify Wednesday behind closed doors before the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee, Fox News has learned, as part of what the president has called an "unfair" effort to subject his son to yet another interview on Russia-related matters.Fox News is told that the interview will likely be relatively brief. Burr received considerable blowback from some of his GOP colleagues for the move, but he told fellow senators that Trump Jr. had backed out of an interview twice, forcing the committee to act.HOUSE VOTES TO HOLD BARR, MCGAHN IN 'CONTEMPT' AS DOJ BLASTS 'TALKING POINT,' GOP REPS FUMEFox News reported last month that Trump Jr. was prepared to make the committee hold him in contempt and had a defiant letter drafted and ready to send -- but at the last minute, the committee reached out to resolve the dispute.

As said here by