Please disable your adblock and script blockers to view this page

WATCH: Amy Coney Barrett Stands Up to Democrat Chris Coons: 'I Hope That You Aren't Suggesting That I Do Not Have My Own Mind'


choose?Barrett
Supreme Court
the Griswold Court’s
Justice
Eisenstadt
Planned Parenthood
the Supreme Court
Obergewell
Viginia Military Institute
VMI
Breitbart News
Sirius XM Patriot
RED NOVEMBER
@joelpollak
FaithPoliticsAmy Coney BarrettChris CoonscontraceptionGriswold


Amy Coney Barrett
Chris Coons
Antonin Scalia
Griswold
John
Roberts
Samuel
Brett
Elena
K]agan
wrong?Barrett
Wade
Baird
Casey
Obergefell
Hodges
Ruth Bader
Ginsburg
’d
B. Pollak
Breitbart


Democratic

No matching tags

No matching tags


Connecticut
Delaware
Lawrence v.
Texas
U.S.
Virginia

No matching tags

Positivity     44.00%   
   Negativity   56.00%
The New York Times
SOURCE: http://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/10/14/watch-amy-coney-barrett-stands-up-to-democrat-chris-coons-i-hope-that-you-arent-suggesting-that-i-do-not-have-my-own-mind/
Write a review: Breitbart News
Summary

Judge Amy Coney Barrett pushed back Wednesday against an effort by Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) to argue that she would endanger the right to contraception because her mentor, the late Justice Antonin Scalia, thought a key decision was wrong.Coons raised the case of Griswold v. Scalia had said that the case was wrongly decided because it referred to a “penumbra” of rights, leading to more activist decisions.The Delaware Senator quizzed Barrett about the case:Coons: When we spoke on the phone last week, you said you cannot think of any specific issue of law where you disagreed with Justice Scalia. But, let me one more time say, are you unwilling to say, as so many currently serving justices currently have, that at least Griswold is not wrong?Barrett: I think Griswold isn’t going anywhere in this you plan to pass a law prohibiting couples, or all people, from using birth control. Would you agree with Justice Scalia that Justice Ginsburg’s decision in VMI was wrong?Barrett: Senator, to be clear, as I think I said in response to this question yesterday, I do share Justice Scalia’s approach to text, originalism and textualism, but in the litany of cases you just identified, the particular votes that he cast are a different question of whether I would agree with the way he applied those principles in particular cases.

As said here by Joel B. Pollak